Trauma and the Nature of Evil
نویسنده
چکیده
It may legitimately be asked, “What is a psychiatrist doing delving into the longstanding philosophical question about the nature of evil?” As we know, finding meaning and redefining reality to incorporate the experience of trauma is a fundamental task for the survivor of overwhelming life experiences (Herman, 1992; McCann and Pearlman, 1990; Janoff-Bulman, 1992). So too, is it one of the fundamental tasks for those of us who listen to the stories of trauma, those who attempt to provide the support needed for victims to turn their nonverbal, inexorable pain into a healing narrative. The effects of trauma are contagious and the witness is always in danger of becoming a secondary victim (Figley, 1995; McCann and Pearlman, 1990; Pearlman and Saakvitne, 1995). The present philosophical exploration of the nature of evil is one of my own attempts to wrestle with this question of meaning. The vicarious brushes with transparent and veiled evil that are a daily experience in the life of a trauma-based physician have led me to explore the eternal question of the nature of man’s inhumanity to man, always with the purpose in mind of locating some keys to its reduction. Like most of us, I come to the subject with many preconceived, implicit, and unarticulated assumptions about my subject, assumptions that spring largely from my immersion in a Judeo-Christian, Western, modern, psychological culture. It seemed important, then, to begin my exploration by learning about the various discourses on the nature of evil that have challenged the beliefs and behaviors of every culture throughout time. “Theodicy” is the word used to the age-old philosophical attempt to reconcile the goodness of God with the existence of evil, a concept generally shortened to “the problem of evil” (Noddings, 1989; Solomon, 1989). For the sake of organization I have broken these discourses down into categories to simplify my discussion. It is likely that these discourses are intermingled in most modern cultural milieus, but the differentiation allows
منابع مشابه
A Comparative Study of the Meaning of “Halū‘” from the Viewpoints of Martyr Muṭahharī and Ayatullāh Jawādī Āmulī
The human is a creature whose being is filled with instinctive and innate qualities. One of these qualities is the “Halū‘iyyat” which is noted in the Qur’ān 70:19 and discusses the sensitivity of the human to the good and the evil. There is a disagreement among the exegetes with regard to the interpretation of this verse. This article has adopted a descriptive-analytical method to examine the o...
متن کاملLiterary Figures in Gāthic Texts
Introduction Gāthic texts are a collection of religious songs of Zarothustra who lived about 1200 BC. Of the seventy two hāts (stanzas) of Yasna (one of the five chapters of Avesta), seventeen hāts belong to five Gāthas. These seventeen hāts have been classified into five categories based on their syllabic meter and the number of the song: 1) ahunavaiti, 2) ushtavaiti, 3)spanta.mainyu, ...
متن کاملProblem of Evil in Taoism
This paper attempts to present the Taoist understanding of evil. In the Taoist tradition, especially in Tao Te Ching, evil is divided into two categories: causal evil and consequential evil. Causal evils are those evils that are said to be the causes of other evils; consequential evils are those that are said to be the consequences of the causal evils. Causal evils originate from human will, an...
متن کاملHospital Employees’ Knowledge of Enjoining Good and Forbidding Evil
Background and Objectives: Enjoining good and forbidding (EGFE) evil are two fundamental topics in Islam. Many verses and narratives underscore the social, religious and political duties implied by enjoining good and forbidding evil. After all, these two divine treasures have been neglected because of indulgence and forgetfulness. The prime reason for this negligence seems to be the obliviousne...
متن کامل